🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a new film. The movie, though, may align so closely with the mythologized image circulated by official channels that, domestically, it functions as a endorsement instead of a critique.

The Manufactured Superhero

Over a long period, the Russian political apparatus and the country's entertainment industry have worked together to craft a tailor-made persona of Putin. This figure is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who always knows beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a TV series released last October, directed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “rescue” Russia from disorder. Although the character's name Mikhail, the message is clear: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions often end up reinforcing this identical story rather than undercutting it. An adaptation inspired by a popular book sets out to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the narrative weight to the spin doctors around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, the president is shown as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to take the top job. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. Historically, none of this ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one actually pleaded with Putin to accept the role. The presidency was in essence a casting call with no shortage of candidates. At the centre to this process stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the state in practice.

• His list included several politicians, including a reformer subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per a journalist who studied his rise, the chosen candidate simply fitted the required parameters: loyal, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A businessman close to the events stated the key criterion was controllability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the notion of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Stories about his clandestine activities in East Germany fall apart under examination. In essence, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not involved with actual agent work.

Curiously, the move to framing him as a “spy” could partly have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s debut as James Bond. The grittier interpretation prompted local outlets and social media to make comparisons with Putin. Edited images replacing Craig’s face with his appeared on city centers, feeding the growing tendency to see him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an actor popular with Russian audiences, the Kremlin are likely to seize the opportunity to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. Its omission of public dissent, the opposition, or key figures from its narrative, even though it includes the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, the president is often an omnipotent figure who never appears directly. His influence is hinted at through portraits or calls “from above”. In this new film, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the exact legends it might seek to examine.